Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 22 classic hull design???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    294
    Rep Power
    22

    22 classic hull design???

    I have two 22 classic transom drawings one is a 98 and the other is a 06, they are not the same my 98 has a rounded bottom with another strake and the 06 is a vee bottom with one strake the dimensions are also different. Does anyone have info on this. Jp

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    12,683
    Rep Power
    34
    One of your drawings is wrong.
    Here's the major differences in the two;

    http://www.donzi.net/forums/showthre...t=50476&page=6
    George Carter
    Central Florida
    gcarter763@aol.com
    http://kineticocentralfl.com/


    “If you have to argue your science by using fraud, your science is not valid"
    Professor Ian Plimer, Adilaide and Melbourne Universities

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    141
    Rep Power
    0
    Here's the one from 1999, I just got this from Donzi yesterday.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Posts
    2,593
    Rep Power
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Zinger View Post
    I have two 22 classic transom drawings one is a 98 and the other is a 06, they are not the same my 98 has a rounded bottom with another strake and the 06 is a vee bottom with one strake the dimensions are also different. Does anyone have info on this. Jp
    Could the 06 drawing you have be a 22ZX? I can't remember how many strakes the ZX has but I believe it has a sharp V-bottom.
    RickS-E

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    12,683
    Rep Power
    34
    Here's the drawing in question of the boat labeled "22C".
    I'd have to assume the drawing has been mis-labeled because there's nothing on it that compares to a 22 Classic.
    Maybe Rick is correct, and I hope he can shed some light on it.
    George Carter
    Central Florida
    gcarter763@aol.com
    http://kineticocentralfl.com/


    “If you have to argue your science by using fraud, your science is not valid"
    Professor Ian Plimer, Adilaide and Melbourne Universities

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    14,603
    Rep Power
    38
    None of the 22's have a V keel, also none have the dip low in the sides a few inches above the chine like Georges drawing. It is just a decent off hand sketch not true to form.
    No matter what your beliefs are "GOD BLESS AMERICA"

    Fully retired marine tech near 60 years in the biz.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,848
    Rep Power
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by MOP View Post
    None of the 22's have a V keel, also none have the dip low in the sides a few inches above the chine like Georges drawing. It is just a decent off hand sketch not true to form.
    I agree, nice sketch but not exactly accurate in detail, Shelby steering rams tho. V keel is wrong as are the sides.
    Cheers,
    Pismo
    1996 22 Classic
    Red with Stainless Windshield
    Stock Gen VI 502 Magnum MPI-415hp
    Stock Bravo I
    25" Mirage Plus
    74.5mph best @ 5050rpm GPS (Speedo said 80)
    27" Labbed Mirage Plus
    75.5mph best @ 4800rpm GPS (Speedo said 82)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,991
    Rep Power
    21
    Looks to me like it is a placement, start points. features to be measured from to put all the cut outs in the right spot.

    there is a 1/4 " discrepency between the center line dimension to the outer strakes on the two drawings

    The trailer drawing has a centerline of 23 3/4 "

    The Rigging drawing has a centerline of 24"
    machinist ,bore it deeper,ream it bigger, and lap it to a fine finish



    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v...=2&theater

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,524
    Rep Power
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by joseph m. hahnl View Post
    Looks to me like it is a placement, start points. features to be measured from to put all the cut outs in the right spot.
    I concur. This drawing is only designed to be used for locating the cutouts and hardware locations for the 496 engine. Engieering Drawing Practice dictates that ONLY the information required to get the job done is to be included on the drawing. In all likelyhood, that drawing is a "shop drawing" that would be used only once..attached to a particular boat with specific options.

    Any other details which are not required....such as exact transom shape in this case, are superfluous and a waste of the draftsmens time. DJ
    Avatar: RELIANCE (1903) The Largest single masted sailing yacht ever built (Until 2004)...with over 16,000 square feet of sail. Successful Americas Cup Defender.
    __________________
    1986 Minx. SBC 350/260hp, Alpha I. Red, Honey.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •