mphatc
10-13-2008, 06:08 PM
Time to clear the waters . .
First I need to apologize and eat a set of my shoe laces . . I jumped to a conclusion by following what have been considered to be "rules of thumb". .
Last week I posted that my new CMI headers had internal leaks . well after more time, a bit of testing, my CMI headers DO NOT leak! My engine suffers from water reversion at idle.
I sealed off my headers and connected them to a garden hose and house water pressure for 15-20 minutes. They stayed dry, with no leaks! FWIW, my house water pressure is 50 PSIG.
The CMI's dump water into the exhaust stream through four 1 /4" ID nozzles approximately 12" beyond the collector merge, this is 20" away from my exhaust port. This is in a 4" OD tube that transitions to 3" further downstream.
This website has a good write up on reversion:
http://www.boatheaders.com/reversionbody.htm
The most common cause for reversion is from an overly aggressive cam. I was cautious of this when we built my 302.
My cam specs are:
Duration 218
Separation: 112
Gross Lift .544"
Engine compression ratio is 10.3 :1
My CMI headers are the Etop , not the sport tubes.
So with all this given, why do I have reversion?
Here's my thoughts, and I'd really like some feedback . . and input!
The CMI headers have huge tubes, the ID is large enough enough for a BIG block, possibly too large for my puuuny 302 Ford . .
It has a crank driven Johnson water pump, which delivers alot more water than the original Jabsco. Water pressure and volume of flow combined with the large volume inside the CMI headers I believe will result in reversion.
My plan to solve this problem includes a water pressure valve to reduce the water flow through my engine and into the exhaust, along with the addition of small tubes to inject the water further down stream in the exhaust from the present points.
I had hoped that the CMI headers would avoid reversion, but between the "too much cooling water" and to low an exhaust flow rate at idle in the huge tubes . .I guess it hasn't . .
Thoughts and input please!!! Am I on the right track?
Thank you,
Mario
First I need to apologize and eat a set of my shoe laces . . I jumped to a conclusion by following what have been considered to be "rules of thumb". .
Last week I posted that my new CMI headers had internal leaks . well after more time, a bit of testing, my CMI headers DO NOT leak! My engine suffers from water reversion at idle.
I sealed off my headers and connected them to a garden hose and house water pressure for 15-20 minutes. They stayed dry, with no leaks! FWIW, my house water pressure is 50 PSIG.
The CMI's dump water into the exhaust stream through four 1 /4" ID nozzles approximately 12" beyond the collector merge, this is 20" away from my exhaust port. This is in a 4" OD tube that transitions to 3" further downstream.
This website has a good write up on reversion:
http://www.boatheaders.com/reversionbody.htm
The most common cause for reversion is from an overly aggressive cam. I was cautious of this when we built my 302.
My cam specs are:
Duration 218
Separation: 112
Gross Lift .544"
Engine compression ratio is 10.3 :1
My CMI headers are the Etop , not the sport tubes.
So with all this given, why do I have reversion?
Here's my thoughts, and I'd really like some feedback . . and input!
The CMI headers have huge tubes, the ID is large enough enough for a BIG block, possibly too large for my puuuny 302 Ford . .
It has a crank driven Johnson water pump, which delivers alot more water than the original Jabsco. Water pressure and volume of flow combined with the large volume inside the CMI headers I believe will result in reversion.
My plan to solve this problem includes a water pressure valve to reduce the water flow through my engine and into the exhaust, along with the addition of small tubes to inject the water further down stream in the exhaust from the present points.
I had hoped that the CMI headers would avoid reversion, but between the "too much cooling water" and to low an exhaust flow rate at idle in the huge tubes . .I guess it hasn't . .
Thoughts and input please!!! Am I on the right track?
Thank you,
Mario