Lenny
10-05-2005, 01:45 PM
...in relation to the ORIGINAL bottom, before it was modified by DONZI? I have looked at Mikes, (not close enough mind you,...YET ;) ) but the X-dim measurements are in relation to the actual bottom. So they should be.
But, the Blackhawk 22's have a lateral line about 8 feet forward of the transom where the bottom has been shaved, (re-shaped) and I am wondering what the STOCK 22 Classic transom height is, from under the rubrail on the hull to hull bottom, and what the transom measures on a Blackhawk 22.
I bet they are NOT the same height which will bring into play a lot of other numbers for X dimension placement on BH Donzis.
How much was shaved and is it just between the inner strakes?
Raining today, can you tell :D
But, the Blackhawk 22's have a lateral line about 8 feet forward of the transom where the bottom has been shaved, (re-shaped) and I am wondering what the STOCK 22 Classic transom height is, from under the rubrail on the hull to hull bottom, and what the transom measures on a Blackhawk 22.
I bet they are NOT the same height which will bring into play a lot of other numbers for X dimension placement on BH Donzis.
How much was shaved and is it just between the inner strakes?
Raining today, can you tell :D